Get our free email newsletter

Understanding Creepage Distances

Dear Readers,
Over the past couple of years many of you have requested that we include more product safety related information in our issues. Of particular interest has been Rich Nute’s series of “Technically Speaking” articles. And so… Mr. Nute has graciously agreed to work with us to bring you that series! Look for his column each month. We hope you enjoy the addition of “Technically Speaking” to the pages of  In Compliance.

The term creepage refers to the abrupt junction of two, parallel insulating media. It is a particular junction — such as that between solid and gaseous insulating media.

TS 8804 fig1

- Partner Content -

Shielding Effectiveness Test Guide

Just as interference testing requires RF enclosures, isolation systems in turn need their own testing. This document reviews some of the issues and considerations in testing RF enclosures.

Note that creepage is not an insulator. Creepage is nothing more than a boundary surface. One characteristic of a boundary or junction is that the two insulating media likely have radically different electric strength ratings (volts per unit distance through the medium). Therefore, the distance between two conductors located at the junction must be chosen for the insulation with the least value of electric strength. Since air has the least value of electric strength, the distance between the two conductors must be based on the electric strength of air (See IEC 664, Table I).

Assume that the junction in question is a plane. As voltage is increased, eventually the air will break down and conduct. When it does so, an arc occurs, and power is dissipated in the arc. If the arc occurs at the surface of the solid insulation, the heat of the arc could burn the surface of the solid insulation and could result in a carbon path across the solid insulation.

One way to positively prevent this carbon path from happening is to move the arc away from the surface of the solid insulation. This can be done with a parallel clearance with smaller dimensions than the creepage. In this way, any arc will occur at the clearance rather than at the creepage.

Another way to prevent a carbon path is to make the clearance distance very long such that its electric strength approaches that of the parallel solid insulation. This is done by interposing a rib of solid insulation between the two conductors where they emerge from the solid insulation (in air, the conductors must diverge such that the clearance between any two points has the required electric strength). The clearance path remains the shortest distance through air, but now the path may include some portion of creepage. Thus the air path is very long, and the electric strength of the clearance becomes very high.

My point is that a creepage path is not an insulator. The air and the solid media are the insulators. The electric strength of the AIR PATH determines the breakdown voltage. The air path can be made very long and its electric strength very high by interposing one or more ribs of solid insulation.

- From Our Sponsors -

Based on the above, consider the following: If a clearance is located remote from a creepage, and its distance is less than that of the creepage such that the clearance will break down at a lower voltage than the creepage, then what should be the requirement for the Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) of the solid insulating medium (assume a pollution free environment)? favicon

 

author nute-richard Richard Nute
is a product safety consultant engaged in safety design, safety manufacturing, safety certification, safety standards, and forensic investigations. Mr. Nute holds a B.S. in Physical Science from California State Polytechnic University in San Luis Obispo, California. He studied in the MBA curriculum at University of Oregon. He is a former Certified Fire and Explosions Investigator.
Mr. Nute is a Life Senior Member of the IEEE, a charter member of the Product Safety Engineering Society (PSES), and a Director of the IEEE PSES Board of Directors. He was technical program chairman of the first 5 PSES annual Symposia and has been a technical presenter at every Symposium. Mr. Nute’s goal as an IEEE PSES Director is to change the product safety environment from being standards-driven to being engineering-driven; to enable the engineering community to design and manufacture a safe product without having to use a product safety standard; to establish safety engineering as a required course within the electrical engineering curricula.

 

 

 

Related Articles

Digital Sponsors

Become a Sponsor

Discover new products, review technical whitepapers, read the latest compliance news, and check out trending engineering news.

Get our email updates

What's New

- From Our Sponsors -

Sign up for the In Compliance Email Newsletter

Discover new products, review technical whitepapers, read the latest compliance news, and trending engineering news.