karen burnham

Effective bonding is crucial for EMC success, but requirements vary by purpose. NASA-STD-4003A defines five bond classes—from static control to lightning protection—each with different impedance and current needs. Understanding which class applies helps engineers design appropriate bonding schemes rather than over- or under-engineering connections.

The IEEE EMC Society is advancing three shielding effectiveness standards: one for large enclosures, another for smaller boxes, and a new standard for portable device pouches. Measuring electromagnetic shielding in space-constrained environments presents significant technical challenges that require innovative solutions.

Modern electronics are too complex for traditional EMC testing approaches. IEEE 1848 offers a revolutionary framework for systematic electromagnetic risk management throughout product lifecycles—transforming reactive compliance into proactive design strategy.

This article summarizes the current state of affairs of standards documents sponsored by the IEEE EMC Society, including areas where there is active development in progress, as well as information on those standards that are currently stable and those that are currently inactive. We’ll also advise readers on how to become more directly involved in the IEEE EMC standards development efforts.

Are transfer impedance and shielding effectiveness really reciprocals? Despite common belief, these critical shield characterization parameters aren't directly related. Learn how triaxial and reverb chamber measurements differ fundamentally, and what these numbers actually tell you about shield quality.

Measuring E-fields in the far field works for the majority of consumer and military hardware developed in the 20th and early 21st centuries. But with EVs becoming more common (for aircraft as well as terrestrial cars), measuring the H-field in the near field is more appropriate.

Navigating the complex world of ESD testing standards? This blog examines how discharge parameters vary across standards, from aerospace's CS118 to automotive's ISO 10605. Discover how resistance and capacitance values affect test severity and learn when to apply custom parameters for your specific threat environment.

Discover how different standards require various approaches to bonding equipment under test to ground planes. Learn the critical differences between MIL-STD-461, CISPR 25, and ANSI C63.4 that could impact your compliance testing results and save you costly retesting.

This article describes the parameters that can be used to tailor your application of MIL-STD-461 RE102, such as frequency ranges, designing notches, and relaxing limits.

Standards and requirements for hardware testing must be carefully tailored rather than rigidly applied. A thorough understanding of source documents, appendices, parent standards, and similar projects helps ensure testing is efficient and relevant for specific hardware applications, preventing delays and oversights.