Get our free email newsletter

Inductor Impedance Evaluation from S-Parameter Measurements: Part 2

S21 Two-Port Shunt and Two-Port Series Methods

This is the second of two articles devoted to the topic of inductor impedance evaluation from the S parameter measurements using a network analyzer. The previous article [1] described the impedance measurements and calculations from the S11 parameters using the one-port shunt, two-port shunt, and two-port series methods. This article is devoted to the impedance measurements and calculations from the S21 parameters using the two-port shunt and two‑port series methods.

The overall conclusion of the previous article was that the inductor impedance evaluation from the S11 parameter measurements is not accurate. This article concludes that the two-port series method is the most accurate method for the inductor impedance evaluation from S21 parameters when using a network analyzer.

Two-Port Shunt Method

The two-port shunt configuration is shown in Figure 1.

- Partner Content -

Common Test & Calibration Uses of a Portable Signal Generator in The Field

This versatile field device generates signals that mimic various sensors to test and calibrate equipment. It helps technicians troubleshoot connections and verify system performance. Portable and battery-powered, it's designed for on-site diagnostic work in industrial environments.
Figure 1
Figure 1: Two-port shunt configuration

For this configuration, the inductor’s impedance in terms of the S21 parameter was derived in [2] as

(1)

Two-Port Series Method

The two-port series configuration is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Two-port series configuration

For this configuration, the inductor’s impedance in terms of the S21 parameter was derived in [3] as

(2)

- From Our Sponsors -

Impedance Measurement Setup and Results

The impedance measurement setup and the PCB boards are shown in Figure 3. The boards were populated with Murata RF inductors, LQG18HH47NJ00, LQC18HH15J00, LQG18HH27J00, of the values 47 nH, 150 nH, and 270 nH, respectively.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Measurement setup and PCBs

Figure 4 shows the impedance curves for a 47 nH inductor using a two-port shunt and two-port series methods. The shunt measurements were taken at 50 dB and self-resonant frequencies. The series measurements were taken at 60 dB and self‑resonant frequencies.

Figure 4
Figure 4: S21-based impedance curves – two-port shunt vs. two‑port series (L = 47 nH)

Figure 5 shows the inductor impedance curve obtained from the Murata Design Support Software “SimSurfing” [4].

Figure 5
Figure 5: Murata “SimSurfing” impedance curve for 47 nH inductor

The two-port shunt, two-port series measurements, and the Murata results are shown in Table 1.

L = 47 nH Two-port shunt Murata
1st 50 dB frequency 257.44 MHz 823 MHz
Resonant frequency 279.49 MHz 1.591 GHz
2nd 50 dB frequency 309.91 MHz 2.985 GHz
L = 47 nH Two-port series Murata
1st 60 dB frequency 1.196 GHz 1.29 GHz
Resonant frequency 1.531 GHz 1.591 GHz
2nd 50 dB frequency 2.087 GHz 1.962 GHz
Table 1: Impedances at 50 dB, 60 dB, and self-resonant frequencies (S21 methods)

It is apparent that the two-port series measurements are significantly closer to the Murata results than the two-port shunt measurements.

Figure 6 shows the impedance curves for a 150 nH inductor using a two-port shunt and two-port series methods. The shunt measurements were taken at 50 dB and self-resonant frequencies. The series measurements were taken at 60 dB and self-resonant frequencies.

Figure 6
Figure 6: S21-based impedance curves – two-port shunt vs. two‑port series (L = 150 nH)

Figure 7 shows the inductor impedance curve obtained from the Murata Design Support Software “SimSurfing.”

Figure 7
Figure 7: Murata “SimSurfing” impedance curve for 150 nH inductor

The two-port shunt, two-port series measurements, and the Murata results are shown in Table 2.

L = 150 nH Two-port shunt Murata
1st 50 dB frequency 126.41 MHz 320 MHz
Resonant frequency 156.94 MHz 810 MHz
2nd 50 dB frequency 194.88 MHz 2.03 GHz
L = 150 nH Two-port series Murata
1st 60 dB frequency 557.78 MHz 601 MHz
Resonant frequency 825.01 MHz 810 MHz
2nd 50 dB frequency 1.148 GHz 1.29 GHz
Table 2: Impedances at 50 dB, 60 dB, and self-resonant frequencies (S21 methods)

Again, the two-port series measurements at 50 dB and self-resonant frequencies are significantly closer to the Murata results than the two-port shunt measurements.

Figure 8 shows the impedance curves for a 270 nH inductor using a two-port shunt and two-port series methods. The shunt measurements were taken at 50 dB and self-resonant frequencies. The series measurements were taken at 60 dB and self-resonant frequencies.

Figure 8
Figure 8: S21-based impedance curves – two-port shunt vs. two‑port series (L = 270 nH)

Figure 9 shows the inductor impedance curve obtained from the Murata Design Support Software “SimSurfing.”

Figure 9
Figure 9: Murata “SimSurfing” impedance curve for 270 nH inductor

The two-port shunt, two-port series measurements, and the Murata results are shown in Table 3.

L = 270 nH Two-port shunt Murata
1st 50 dB frequency 86.31 MHz 184 MHz
Resonant frequency 116.36 MHz 638 MHz
2nd 50 dB frequency 156.97 MHz 1.992 GHz
L = 270 nH Two-port series Murata
1st 60 dB frequency 361.67MHz 395 MHz
Resonant frequency 605.54 MHz 638 MHz
2nd 50 dB frequency 933.99 MHz 1.03 GHz
Table 3: Impedances at 50 dB, 60 dB, and self-resonant frequencies (S21 methods)

Once again, the two-port series measurements at 50 dB and self-resonant frequencies are significantly closer to the Murata results than the two-port shunt measurements.

The overall conclusion is that the two-port series method is the most accurate method of the inductor’s impedance evaluation from the S21 parameter measurements.

References

  1. Bogdan Adamczyk, Patrick Cribbins, and Khalil Chame, “Inductor Impedance Evaluation from S Parameter Measurements – Part 1: S11 One-Port Shunt, Two-Port Shunt, and Two‑Port Series Methods,” In Compliance Magazine, April 2025.
  2. Bogdan Adamczyk, Patrick Cribbins, and Khalil Chame, “Capacitor Impedance Evaluation from S Parameter Measurements – Part 1: S11 One-Port Shunt, Two-Port Shunt, and Two-Port Series Methods,” In Compliance Magazine, February 2025.
  3. Bogdan Adamczyk, Patrick Cribbins, and Khalil Chame, “Capacitor Impedance Evaluation from S Parameter Measurements – Part 2: S21 Two‑Port Shunt and Two-Port Series Methods,” In Compliance Magazine, March 2025.
  4. Murata Design Support Software, “SimSurfing.”

Related Articles

Digital Sponsors

Become a Sponsor

Discover new products, review technical whitepapers, read the latest compliance news, and check out trending engineering news.

Get our email updates

What's New

- From Our Sponsors -

Sign up for the In Compliance Email Newsletter

Discover new products, review technical whitepapers, read the latest compliance news, and trending engineering news.

Close the CTA