# Smith Chart Basics: Network Analyzer Calibration

Network analyzer measurements require the calibration procedure which utilizes a calibration kit, consisting of a short, open, and a 50 Ω load attachment. The easiest way to verify that the calibration procedure has been done correctly is by utilizing a Smith chart menu on a network analyzer. This column introduces the basics of Smith chart and shows their applicability in the calibration procedure verification.

Smith chart is based on a polar plot of the voltage reflection coefficient at the transmission line load. Let’s review this concept first.

Reflections at the Load on a Transmission Line

Consider a transmission line of length L driven by a sinusoidal voltage source G with a source resistance RG, and terminated by a resistive load RL, as shown in Figure 1. ZC is the characteristic impedance of the transmission line and T is the time it takes for the voltage wave to travel from the source to the load. Figure 1: Transmission line driven by a sinusoidal source and terminated by a resistive load

When the switch closes at t = 0, a forward voltage wave, V +, originates at z = 0 and travels toward the load. This shown in Figure 2, (see  for the detailed discussion). Figure 2: Forward voltage wave originates at the source and travels toward the load

At the time T this voltage wave reaches the load and sets up a reflection, V . This is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Incident and reflected voltages at the load

The reflected voltage, V -, is related to the incident voltage, V +, by (1)

where ΓL is the load reflection coefficient: (2)

Next, we will discuss three special cases of the reflection coefficient , (these three cases are directly applicable to the network analyzer calibration procedure).

Short-Circuited Line RL = 0

In this case the reflection coefficient is (3)

Open-Circuited Line RL = ∞

In this case the reflection coefficient is (4)

Matched Line RL = ZC

In this case the reflection coefficient is (5)

Smith Chart Basics

The Smith chart, shown in Figure 4, is based on a polar plot of the voltage reflection coefficient, . Figure 4: Smith chart

In general the load reflection coefficient is complex and thus can be expressed as (6)

Thus any reflection coefficient can be plotted as a unique point on the ΓrΓi plane, as shown in Figure 5. The magnitude, Γ, is plotted as a radius from the center of the chart, and the angle θ, (-180°≤ θ ≤ 180°) is measured counterclockwise from the right-hand side of the horizontal Γr axis. Figure 5: Unit circle on which the Smith chart is constructed

Each point on the Smith chart corresponds to a unique value of the voltage reflection coefficient at the load. Thus the three special cases of the reflection coefficient discussed in the previous section (short, open matched load) correspond to the three special points shown in Figure 6. Figure 6: Reflection coefficient location for a short, open and matched load

Calibration Procedure

The calibration procedure utilizes a calibration kit, like the ones shown in Figure 7, which consists of a short, open, 50 Ω load attachment, and often a thru connector. Figure 7: a) N-type calibration kit, b) SMA-type calibration kit

A few different types of calibrations can be performed, depending on the parameter of interest . If only the s11 measurements are required then the calibration is performed at port 1 with a short, open and 50 Ω (load) terminations as shown in Figure 8. Figure 8: Calibration for s11 measurements

The results of the calibration can be verified using Smith chart menu of the network analyzer. When the calibration procedure is successful, the Smith chart plots of the voltage reflection coefficient should resemble the ones shown in Figures 9 through 11. Figure 9: Calibration result for a short Figure 10: Calibration result for an open Figure 11: Calibration result for a (matched) load

On the other hand, if the calibration procedure is not performed correctly or the cables or connectors are damaged, the calibration results might look like the ones shown in Figures 12 and 13. Figure 12: Faulty calibration result for a short Figure 13: Faulty calibration result for an open

In our measurement the fault was caused by a damaged SMA connector, shown in Figure 14. Figure 14: Damaged SMA connector

References

1. Bogdan Adamczyk, “Transmission Line Reflections at a Resistive Load,” In Compliance Magazine, January 2017.
2. Bogdan Adamczyk, Foundations of Electromagnetic Compatibility with Practical Applications, Wiley, 2017.
3. Ulaby, T. U. and Ravaioli, U., Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, 7th ed., Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2015.
4. Bogdan Adamczyk and Jim Teune, “S-Parameter Tutorial – Part II: EMC Measurements and Testing,” In Compliance Magazine, September 2018. Dr. Bogdan Adamczyk
is a professor and the director of the EMC Center at Grand Valley State University  where he performs research and develops EMC educational material. He is an iNARTE certified EMC Master Design Engineer, a founding member and the chair of the IEEE EMC West Michigan Chapter. Prof. Adamczyk is the author of the textbook “Foundations of Electromagnetic Compatibility with Practical Applications” (Wiley, 2017). He can be reached at adamczyb@gvsu.edu. Dimitri Häring
is a graduate assistant at Grand Valley State University.  He works closely with Prof. Adamczyk developing EMC educational material and assists him with GVSU’s EMC Center.  He is currently working on his Master’s Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Grand Valley State University. Further interests are Internet of Things and Embedded Systems programming.