Get our free email newsletter

Common-Impedance Coupling

Impact of the Return Path Impedance and the Return Current Levels

This month we explore the impact of the return path impedance and the return current level on common-impedance coupling between circuits. The measurements presented here were performed on a custom PCB containing audio, video, and high-current circuitry, where the return paths for each circuit were selectively shared with other circuits. This topic had been previously discussed in [1], where the measurements were taken with a first-generation PCB. The PCB has since been redesigned to lend itself to future modifications and to contain off-the-shelf, readily available components.

1. Common-Impedance Circuit Model

Consider the situation shown in Figure 1, where two circuits share the return path with a non-zero impedance.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Common-impedance coupling circuit

The voltages at the loads are

- Partner Content -

A Dash of Maxwell’s: A Maxwell’s Equations Primer – Part Two

Maxwell’s Equations are eloquently simple yet excruciatingly complex. Their first statement by James Clerk Maxwell in 1864 heralded the beginning of the age of radio and, one could argue, the age of modern electronics.

Equation 1 (1a)

Equation 2 (1b)

Note that the load voltage of circuit 1, L1, is affected by the return current of circuit 2, L2; similarly, the load voltage of circuit 2, L2, is affected by the return current of circuit 1, L1. This type of coupling is called the common-impedance coupling. Common-impedance coupling becomes an EMC problem when two or more circuits share a common return path (common ground) and one or more of the following conditions exist:

  • a high-impedance ground (at high frequency: too much inductance; at low frequency: too much resistance),
  • a large ground current,
  • a very sensitive, low-noise margin circuit, sharing the ground with other circuits.

(Note: a similar situation occurs when the circuits share a common forward path).

2. Measurement Setup and PCB Circuitry

Figure 2 shows the board used in the experiment, while Figure 3 shows the setup for the common-impedance measurements. The corresponding circuit diagram is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows four different circuits and several switches controlling the return path for each circuit.

- From Our Sponsors -
Figure 2
Figure 2: PCB board used in the experiment

 

Figure 3
Figure 3: Measurement set up for common-impedance coupling

 

Figure 4
Figure 4: Circuit diagram

3. Measurement Results

First, we investigated the impact of the return path impedance on the audio circuitry with no other circuit sharing that path. This configuration is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Audio circuitry: low- vs. high-impedance return path

Common-impedance coupling does not occur here, since there are no other circuits that could couple to the audio circuit. The measurement result is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Audio circuitry measurement results: low- vs. high-impedance return path

In all measurements, cursor a shows the voltage levels for the low-impedance path, while cursor b shows the results for the high-impedance return path. There is an 18 mV voltage shift when changing from low to high impedance, with an audible increase in the speaker noise and slight video degradation.

Next, the video circuitry and the 555 timer currents were added to the common return path, shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7
Figure 7: Audio, video, and 555 circuitry (R = 100 kΩ):
low- vs. high-impedance return path

There was no discernible impact on the audio and video circuitry. Subsequently, the current level from the 555 timer was increased by a factor of 1000 by changing the resistance value from 100 kΩ to 100 Ω in the return path, shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8

The voltage shift between the low- and high‑impedance paths was 78 mV, shown in Figure 9. The audible speaker noise increased with additional video degradation.

Figure 9
Figure 9: Audio, video, and 555 circuitry (R = 100 kΩ): low- vs. high-impedance return path

Figure 10 shows the final system configuration, where a high current was injected into the common return path. The measurement result is shown in Figure 11.

Figure 10
Figure 10: System configuration with the high current addition

 

Figure 11
Figure 11: Measurement results with the high current addition

Note the significant increase in the voltage levels (610 mV) compared to the previous cases. Both the audible speaker noise and the video degradation increased considerably. The measurements and observations support the conclusions presented at the end of Section 1.

References

  1. Adamczyk, B. and Teune, J., “Common‑Impedance Coupling between Circuits,” In Compliance Magazine, January 2018.

Related Articles

Digital Sponsors

Become a Sponsor

Discover new products, review technical whitepapers, read the latest compliance news, and check out trending engineering news.

Get our email updates

What's New

- From Our Sponsors -

Sign up for the In Compliance Email Newsletter

Discover new products, review technical whitepapers, read the latest compliance news, and trending engineering news.